Division of Translational Medicine, Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509, United States
Corresponding author details:
Mizejewski GJ
Division of Translational Medicine Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory Wadsworth Center
New York Department of Health, Empire State Plaza
NY 12201-0509,United States
Copyright:
© 2019 Mizejewski GJ.
This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 international License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.
Alzheimer’s disorder (AD) is an affliction in the advanced age population that affects
memory and cognition loss in patients. Due to loss of estrogen hormones during menopause,
estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) came into clinical use in the last decade for women
diagnosed with AD. However, clinical treatments declined due to unfavorable cardiac side
effects. More recent studies have now shown that ERT can be neuroprotective for AD when
timed at the onset of menopause. Due to the many physiological activities of estrogen in
the brain, ERT has once again gained clinical prominence for AD female patients. In the
present report, the process of cell amyloidosis is first addressed followed by description
of the structure and function of the Beta amyloid peptide (Abeta) fragments. This was
followed by a analysis of the biochemical composition of the Abeta peptide sub fragments
including their hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity profiles and amino acid sequences. Finally,
the Abeta peptides were compared to a similar positive control peptide in a rodent uterine
assay to determine whether Abeta and sub fragments were capable of inhibiting-growth
in estrogen-sensitive cells and tissues (i.e. brain). This is the first study to propose that
Alzheimer-derived peptide fragments could possibly interfere and/or hinder the effect of
estrogen stimulated growth on targeted cells and tissues (hence, ERT) in the brain.
Peptides; Beta Amyloid; Alzheimer’s; Uterine Inhibition; Amyloidosis; EstrogenMediated Growth
General
The role of estrogen (estradiol, E2) in AD induced dementia and cognitive decline in aging women has recently gained renewed clinical research interest during the last decade; this followed a decline in clinical literature reports [5]. The reduction in biomedical clinical studies resulted from published reports that heart disorders were associated with Estrogen Replacement Therapy (ERT) in postmenopausal women diagnosed with AD [6]. In contrast, recent results have now shown that the timing of ERT administration at the onset of menopause rather than postmenopausal, could prevent or delay the decrease in memory loss and cognition in women with AD [7]. Following menopause, estrogen levels appear to be lower in females than in aged-matched male patients. Estrogens synthesized in the postmenopausal period in women are limited to production in the cal cells and adrenal cortex cells [8].
Alpha-fetoprotein is a tumor-associated fetal protein produced during pregnancy. Interestingly, AFP in newborn rodents was found to protect the rodent
brain against excess estrogen levels that can induce androgenization
and masculinization [9]. The presence of high levels of AFP in the
postnatal rodent brain is thought to influence developmental neuron
circuit patterning necessary for mating behavior; such cells/tissues
in the brain are regulated by estrogen [10]. AFP has also been
employed as the protein of origin for producing of non-toxic synthetic
therapeutic peptides (34 AA length and its fragments) to study their
anti-estrogenic activities on growth both in vitro and in vivo models
[11]. In comparison to the toxic Abeta peptides, the non-toxic AFPderived peptides similarly function to block the action of E2 on
estrogen-sensitive brain cell growth responses [10,11].
As an objective, it was deemed of importance to study the effects
of toxic Abeta peptides on estrogen-induced tissues in parallel with
non-toxic AFP control peptides (of similar length) using in vivo
animal models of estrogen-stimulated growth. From an opposite
standpoint, such studies would be directed at the effect of Abeta
peptides on E2-sensitive cells rather than the effect of E2 on Abetaaffected cells. In light of the proposed neuroprotective effects of
estrogen on the Abeta peptide in AD patients, the present study
sought to determine the effects of Abeta peptides on non-brain
cells. Studies on the effects of A beta peptides on non-brain cells are
presently absent in the biomedical literature. Furthermore, there are
few if any studies of Abeta peptides directly affecting the function of
a reproductive organ, such as the uterus, ovary, mammary gland, or
testis, except in ovariectomy studies [12]. In contrast, studies of AFPderived peptides have been extensively reported concerning their
anti-estrogenic activity in rodent reproductive models. Thus, it was
determined to assay and compare the effects of toxic Abeta peptides
to an established activity of non-toxic AFP-peptide in inhibiting the
estrogen growth response in the immature rodent uteri. It is further
germane to this report that the gene for the Alzheimer Amyloid BetaProtein Precursor (APP) has recently been detected in the rat testis
and appears to play a role in reproductive cellular differentiation
and morphologic changes of the sperm [13]. Finally, it is of further
interest that the process of amyloidosis in breast cancer can induce
malignant cells to enter a dormant or resting state devoid of cell
division, growth, and proliferation [14]. Thus, cancer cells have been
reported to undergo growth cessation after entering a dormant state
following accumulation of large aggregations of amyloid fibrils within
the cancer cell cytoplasm. This would explain the low incidence of
breast cancer in women with Alzheimer’s disorder [14].
Amyloid (A) Bodies: A-bodies are insoluble proteinaceous fibrous aggregates formed from cross-β polymerization of β-pleated sheets [15]. The aggregation of A-bodies leads to fibril formations (10 nm fibrils) and to toxic plaque deposits in brain cells. Therefore, amyloid proteins play a central role in the pathogenesis of AD [16] due to the formation and presence of A-bodies resulting from ALD. Such deposits occur in other human neuropathies, such as Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease. All these disorders exhibit an unfolded amyloid-protein structure, rather than the natural (tertiary) protein fold. Such strictures are subject to the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) pathway, a cellular stress response to misfolded or unfolded protein [17]. This latter pathway is associated with heat-shock and glucose-shock proteins produced within the endoplasmic reticulum.
ALD is a by-product of cytoplasmic polypeptide assembly, and A-bodies are a highly organized form of protein aggregation that converts native-fold proteins into β-sheet rich aggregates that are protease K and sodium dodecyl sulfate resistant multimers [14]. Interestingly, A-body peptides are amphipathic, can bind various metals, such as ion, zinc, copper, and cobalt, and can function as cell-membrane disrupters and channel formers [18-20]. These chelated metal proteins not only disrupt cell membranes, but aid in penetrating cell membranes, binding to receptors, and inducing the formation of endocytic vesicles [21]. Metal binding to the amyloid peptide sequence is due to the positioning of two histidine residues that aid in producing a tetrahedral symmetrical formation [22]. In the physiological state, the resultant protein fibrils are nontoxic; moreover, the A-body formations are reversible by means of protein chaperone interactions employing HSP70, HSP90, and GRP78 shockinduced disaggregation agents [23,24].
Contrary to popular belief, (ALD) is a common occurrence in eukaryotic cells [14]. A recent report further elucidated ALD as a natural physiological response in mammalian cells responding to multiple stress stimulations [25]. The ALD process enables cells to aggregate protein as fibrils for storage, thereby facilitating adaptation to cellular stresses. As such, ALD enables cells to store large quantities of fibrillary proteins and enter a dormant or resting state, while still remaining viable during extended periods of stimulation from extracellular stressors. Eukaryotic cells frequently encounter environmental stress factors, such as inflammation, hypoxia, high temperatures, H2 O2 peroxidation, acidosis, pH extremes, oxidative stresses, and other conditions associated with growth dysregulation [24,25]. For example, high extracellular and/or cytoplasmic temperatures activate both the heat/glucose shock response and the UPR. Expression of the chaperone proteins (HSP70/90, GRP78) enables the cell to reduce the total cell volume of misfolded proteins by refolding proteins back to their native folded state [23]. In a similar fashion, transcription factors can activate several genes that respond to hypoxic environments, augmenting oxygen delivery and increasing glucose metabolism during low-oxygen periods [25]. Whatever the environmental stress stimulation may be, both the stress response and the UPR are designed to aid in: 1) restoring cell homeostasis, 2) repairing cell/molecular damage, and 3) sustaining cell viability in situations of environmental stress encounters [25].
Amyloid-converting motif: In the normal physiological response to stress described above, cells induce an amyloid state in their cytoplasmic proteins by invoking and activating a discrete peptide 30-42 stretch of amino acids (AAs) on proteins termed the “Amyloid-Converting Motif” (ACM) [26]. Studies show that the AAsequence stretch of the ACM is crucial in converting cell proteins into A-bodies by interacting with a nuclear ribosomal intergenic spacer noncoding RNA (rIgS RNA). For example, rIgS RNA interacting with the toxic β-amyloid peptide (1-42 AA-sequence stretch) is directly involved with inducing plaque formation in cells of AD patients ; such patients exhibit an ACM-like sequence in the process of initiating amyloidogenesis in vivo [26]. Therefore, the ACM comprises peptide sequences derived from proteins and can be divided into two distinct sub motifs consisting of an arginine/histidine (R/H)-rich sequence and a highly amylodogenic AA sequence that binds Congo red, thioflavin, and Amylo-Glo dyes. The latter domain displays AA (singleletter code: (X=any AA) di-and tripeptide clusters, such as KXL, LXK, GXG, and GXL/I, as well as HX5-9H, the latter of which lies within or adjacent to the R/H-rich areas on the peptide [25,26]. Such ACM sequences are found in one to three distinct regions on many diverse proteins, such as CDK1, residues 100-130; HAT1, residues 228-260; HDAC2, residues 1-33; pVHL, residues 104-140; APP, residues 1-42; α2 M, residues 1,314-1,365; and ApoE; residues 200-299 [27].
ABeta42 is a Cell Membrane Fusion Peptide: Cell membrane
fusion peptides are cell membrane disrupting molecules that can
insert and form channels in the bilipid layer leaflets of the plasma
membrane [28]. Examples in nature of such peptides include:
Viral peptides, Calcein, Diphtheria toxin fragments, γ-hemolysins,
leucocidins, and the β-amyloid (Abeta-42) peptides. Such Linear
Peptides can insert into bilipid cell membrane in a tilted oblique
position (70o
angle), which perturbs the cell membrane bilayer
[29]. The peptides induce lipid destabilization by influencing the
cholesterol and acidic phospholipid compartmental organization
to form large conformational spaces. Membrane permeability
(insertion) of the peptide can fill and occupy these open spaces and
induce vesicle fusion with the membrane bilayer which disrupts the
laemellar leaf organization of the phospholipids. Lipid destabilization
provides the peptides with the ability to adopt multi-stable positions in the presence of lipids followed by the formation of peptide
aggregates at or within the cell membrane bilayer [30]. Studies of
peptidicfusogenic agents have documented that the process requires
only 1.0 minute accomplishing fusion and permeabilization into the
cell membrane. The peptides are then able to translocate through the
membrane having access to wide conformational spaces (channel)
induced in the deep lipid core of the second bilayer. Lipids in 5 to 50
excess molar ratios to peptides are known to induce striking increases
in the diameter of liposome particles exposed to fusogenic peptides
[31]. Finally, since biological membranes are heterogeneous, locally
high peptide concentrations can transiently occur, and such peptide
concentrations can be detected under physiological conditions in
vivo.
Biochemistry of Abeta Peptide Fragments: Progressive neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disorder (AD) and Parkinson’s disease involve amyloidosis as described above, in which insoluble toxic protein fibers are deposited in cell/tissues which impair their function [32]. Aggregated amyloid fibers in AD are produced as intracellular, proteinaceous deposits which exhibit a cross-beta sheet and beta turn secondary structure (Figure 1); such fibers are identified by a green birefringence when stained with Congo Red and increased fluorescence when complexed with thioflavin [15]. Beta-amyloid peptides (Abeta) are cleaved by specific secretase enzymes form a larger transmembrane amyloid precursor protein (APP), and are found deposited in the brain of patients suffering from AD; such plaques are linked to neurotoxicity [34]. The transmembrane APPs are cleaved by beta and gamma-secretase enzymes within the plasma membrane bilayer generating various Amino Acid (AA) length amyloid peptides with a 42 AA sequence peptide being the most toxic. Additional Abeta peptides include a 40 AA residue and a 25-35 residue in addition to the more numerous 42 AA fragments. It is the accumulation, aggregation and localization of the cleaved peptide segments within the cell plasma membrane lipid bilayer that contributes to neuronal death. Interestingly, various fragments of the Abeta peptide (residues 1-28, 25-35, 38-42) show biophysical and biochemical properties similar to the full length 42AA peptide [34].. It has also been reported that metal ion binding (Cu,2+ Fe,2+, Ni++ and Zu2+) is implicated in modulating the Abeta peptide-to-plasma membrane interactions involving membrane phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylserine in the course of lipid bilayer disruptions [18-20,35]. The amino-acid coordination of the divalent cation metal binding involves the double histidine residues present either in tandem or close juxtaposition at AA positions 13-14 of the 42 AA peptide [22]. Both enhanced deposition of aggregated Abeta and the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are thought to be consequences following coordination of metal ion binding since Abeta 1-42 have a very high affinity for Cu++ and Zn++ at His13 and His14. Thus, the histidine clusters in the Abeta segment have been found to constitute high affinity sites for binding of Abeta peptides on immobilized metal chelates columns [19]. It is interesting that, the AFP-derived GIP-34 control peptide can also bind copper & zinc [22]. In addition to metal binding, the Abeta peptide can complex to alpha 2-macroblobulin for cellular uptake, and demonstrates high affinity binding to both the alpha-7-nicotinic acetylcholine brain cell surface receptor and to the carboxy-terminal domain of serum apolipoprotein-E.
Abeta and GIP-34 AA Sequences Composition: The Abeta toxic peptide has a 42-amino acid (AA) sequence comprised of the following AA single letter codes: DAEFRHDSGYEVHHQKLVFFAEDVGSNKGAIIGLMVGGVVIA [36]. The 42-mer Abeta peptide contains 19 hydrophobic amino acids, 8 intermediate amino acids, and 15 hydrophilic amino-acids, making it an amphipathic peptide with multiple dipolar ions (Zwitterions) (Table 1). In comparison, the peptide AA sequence for the 36- mer AFP-derived synthesized peptide has been determined to beLSEDKLLACGEGAADIIIGHLCIRHEMTPVNPGVGN (GIP-34) composed of residues 447-480 of the α-fetoprotein full length polypeptide [22].In comparison to Abeta-42, the 36-mer GIP-peptide contains 16 hydrophobic amino acids, 7 intermediate amino acids, and 11 hydrophobic amino acids, also making it an amphipathic peptide. The 42-AA Abeta contains slightly more hydrophobic and hydrophilic AAs than does the GIP-36. However, the Abeta-42 also contains 6 more total AAs than the GIP-36. In nature, the amphipathic peptides have an advantage in that they bind either positive or negative charged surfaces or cell membranes. A structural image comparison of Abeta-42 and GIP-34 revealed that the 2 peptides show similar configurations as displayed in the minimal energy computer models (Figure 1).
Amino Acid Sequence Matches: An amino acid sequence match was performed to search for amyloid-associated protein matches to the AFP-derived peptide (Table 2).The GIP-36 amino acid sequence was subjected to a FASTA search in the Genbank (GCG Wisconsin Program) database. FASTA employs a Z-based statistics algorithm in order to demonstrate identities and similarities (relationship) between protein and/or peptide amino acid sequences. The GCG search found identity/similarity sequence matches of GIP-36 to that of Alzheimer’s-associated proteins such as serum Amyloidbeta, acetyl cholinesterase (Ache) receptors and co-transporters. Other matches for Amyloid-associated proteins to GIP-36 included apolipoprotein-E, muscarinic Ache, and tissue plasminogen. These amino-acid matches provide evidence that the GIP-36 peptides contain short recognition cassettes comparable to the AA sequences of Amyloid-like peptides and related AD proteins. The Ache receptor matches further lend credence to the proposal that AFP-derived peptides may be structurally-related to the Abeta peptides involving cholinergic functions [4].
Physiologic Roles of Estrogen in Humans: Estrogens such as E2 are known to play important roles in female reproductive activities as observed in both in vitro and in vivo studies [12]. Such reports have demonstrated that E2 modulates multiple physiological effects in various areas of the brain. For example, E2 can activate basal cholinergic functions related to memory and learning in brain regions such as the hippocampus and neocortical forebrain cells. In comparison, a consistent decrease in cholinergic activity is observed in these same brain areas in AD female patients. E2 further affects functions in signaling molecules, transduction agents, neurotransmitters, and in proteins such as apolipoprotein-E, and choline acetyltransferase (Table 2); E2 can also affect activities such as Abeta protein deposition, oxidative stress, and cognitive functioning. Mechanism of such E2 functions involve activities such as: 1) antiangiogenesis; 2) mitochondrial anti-oxidative effects; 3) neuronal cell dendritic outgrowths; and 4) neurotransmitter-associated cognition. It is noteworthy that the E2 receptors (ER α, ER β) are expressed on glial and neuron cells in the neocortex and hippocampus of the brain [39]. Neurons present in-such brain areas are specifically involved in cognitive activities in forebrain cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basal are; such activities include memory, attention, and cognitive encoding. The alpha and beta E2 receptors themselves are encoded on different chromosomes, and are expressed in affected areas in the brains of AD patients [40]. Furthermore, the E2 receptor beta was found to promote Abeta degradation via autophagy [41]. Finally, E2 can also reduce the neuronal generation of Abeta peptides [42].
As discussed above, ERT is best administered to women approaching menopause in order to replace hormones (estrogen, progesterone) levels that are gradually being reduced. ERTs are used to dampen the physiological effects in menopausal women undergoing hot flashes, night sweats, and bone loss (osteoporosis). The hormone treatments were utilized to protect or delay the onset of AD and other dementias [43,44]. Thus, ERTs are meant to protect against the loss of sex steroid hormones and could benefit women with lowered E2 blood levels. Thus, the timing of HRT at or near the onset of menopause is now deemed critical for treatment efficacy. Beneficial follow-up effects have even been observed in women as long as 10 years following the HRT regimen. E2s can be administered by oral pills, and transdermal skin patches [45]. The interests in the use of HRT before or near the onset of menopause have now been re-vitalized with increased clinical adaptations. However, the antiestrogenic effects on Abeta peptides on potential E2-sensitive brain cells could affect E2 dose levels administered during HRT.
Estrogen Functions in AD Animal Models: It has been found
that physiological levels of E2 reduce the generation of Abeta peptide
in cultured human neuroblastoma cells and in primary cultures of
rat, mouse, and human embryonic cerebrocortical neurons [45].
Moreover, brain Abeta peptides (1-40 and 1-42) in ovariectomized rats
were increased nearly two-fold compared to controls; concomitantly,
uterine atrophy was accompanied by decreased serum E2 levels [12].
Estradiol was also found to block the intracellular calcium changes
in neurons following interaction with Abeta peptides [47]. The
estrogen neuroprotection against Abeta toxicity was found to require
expression of cell membrane forms of alpha-and/or beta Estrogen
Receptor (ER) followed by activation of the MAP kinase pathway
[48]. Studies in transgenic mice and guinea pigs suggested that the
mechanisms involved in the generation and/or the clearance of Abeta
[1-42] were the preferential targets for the estrogen protective action
[49,50]. Other mechanisms of E2 neuro protection have included: 1)
the previously discussed antioxidant effects of E2; 2) activation of
neuroprotective transcription genes; and 3) cross talk among various
intracellular signaling cascades [51]. Overall, the neuro protection
by estrogen against Abeta toxicity signifies that the mammalian brain
contains estrogen-sensitive tissues that are still subject to Abeta
neurotoxicity following estrogen reduction. It is further known
that the brain is highly sensitive to estrogen stimulation via various
feedback systems such as the pituitary-hypothalamic axis and
surrounding areas of several brain nuclei regions.
Figure 1: Peptide Computer Modeling: The minimal energy nonsolvent election cloud and stick computer models of the linear
CIP peptides were generously provided by Dr. Curt Brennerman,
Department of Chemistry, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy,
NY. The computer modeling of the peptides were performed using
methods described in prior publications [34,35].
III: Hydrophilic Amino Acids
*Single Letter Amino Acid Code
Table 1: A hydrophobicity index list is presented for the amino acids present on the Beta-Amyloid (Abeta) peptide versus the alpha-fetoprotein
growth inhibitory peptide (GIP)
Table 3: An assessment of anti-estrogenic activity utilizing Abeta and
AFP peptides performed in Rodent Immature Uterine Assays*, **
N# = number of animals utilized
NA = non-applicable;
The effect of E2 depletion at menopause appears to clinically hasten the onset of AD regarding memory loss and dementia in female patients [44]. This event can be offset by HRT, especially employing estrogen (E2). AS shown above, estrogen-stimulated cell activation in critical areas of the brain has been localized to the hippocampus and neocortical forebrain neurons regarding cholinergic activities. Such areas are known to be directly involved in memory, attention, and cognitive functions. Understanding the physiologic process of amyloidosis and amyloid body formation has revealed that these actions are normal physiologic processes gone away. In this report it was discussed that peptides/proteins can be converted into amyloid forms by an RNA translated code into protein AA segments by an amyloid-converting motif AA sequence. Non-AD afflicted cells normally employ the process of amyloidosis for protein storage within cells. However, if over-stressed and non-regulated, amyloidlike proteins can give rise to peptide fragments amounts toxic to their host cells [16,17]. In lieu of recent clinical studies promoting ERT at the onset as opposed to the termination of menopause, present findings have now focused on the potential effects of E2 on brain cell activities involving cholinergic memory loss. However, data from the present report indicates that the Abeta peptide-42, and its sub fragments can themselves block the action of E2 - induced growth on estrogen sensitive cells. In a reverse paradigm, attention in the present report has been directed on whether Abeta peptides themselves can suppress steroid hormone action on E2-sensitive cell responses in cells of animal models. Such studies could have implications which might extend to AD human brain cells in patients receiving HRT.
The observations in the present report indicate that the AD
induced Abeta peptides can suppress estrogen-induced growth in a non-brain animal models. The Abeta peptide is cleaved by secretase
enzymes from a Transmembrane (TM) segment from an APP
precursor molecule. The TM segments of proteins contain sequences
of strongly hydrophobic AAs segments, which are capable of plasma
membrane disruption leading to cell toxicity and subsequent
apoptosis. Indeed, the structure and function of the toxic Abeta
peptides are similar and resemble those of the non-toxic AFP-derived
peptides (GIP-34) described herein; such observations justify the use
of GIP as an assay positive control peptide. Due to their amphipathic
AA structure, these peptides are capable of perturbing the outer
bilayer of cell membranes and penetrating into the cell interior by
pore/channel formation at the plasma membrane. It is tempting to
speculate that the toxicity of Abeta versus the non-toxicity of GIP-34
might be explained by the ratio of hydrophobic versus hydrophilic
amino acids in their peptide sequences. Nonetheless, both peptide
fragments are capable of inhibiting estrogen-stimulated cell growth
in animal models, an action similar to anti-microbial pore-forming
peptides [30,55]. It is interesting that Abetapeptides have been
reported to be cytotoxic causing subsequent apoptosis while the GIP36 peptide is cytostatic and produces no observable side effects [56].
The antiestrogenic effect displayed by Abeta in the present report
may partially explain why early premenopausal ERTs (low levels of
Abeta peptide), are more effective than in late postmenopausal ERT.
Finally, the antiestrogenic cell growth effect on target cells/tissues
(i.e. cancer cells) described herein may further explain why women
with AD experience less breast cancer occurrence than in non-breast
cancer patients with AD [14]. This phenomenon might be linked to
multiple research reports that AFP-derived GIP inhibits growth of
estrogen-sensitive breast cancer cells in pre-clinical studies [14]. It
would be of interest that AD-associated Abeta peptides could possess
such anticancer growth properties as well. Two such reports in the
literature demonstrated that certain Abeta peptides could inhibit
cancer growth via an anti-angiogenic mechanism [57,58]. However,
Abeta peptides cell toxicity other than in cancer cells might impede
their potential use as anti-cancer therapeutic agents. Nonetheless,
the “take home” message in the present study is that Abeta peptides
can exhibit anti-estrogenic activities.
None; no U.S. federal grants were used in the preparation of this
paper.
The author declares that there are no known conflicts of interest
in the preparation of this manuscript.
Copyright © 2020 Boffin Access Limited.